Cyber Wars Forums

That wouldnt really help much as you would lose out on new members and what about those instances where you have to boot someone due to what they are doing/saying.

I think that locking the gang down would be a terrible thing

How would you lose out on new members? It just stops you losing members during wars, not gaining them. I think it's a good idea. It stops gangs from kicking people just to win wars.

107$ [16] wrote:What if; Gang owners/co's not being able to boot and no member can join/leave during a war. When you hit the war button the gang gets closed.

Might do well as a suggestion on its own

How about the gang still being able to get applications but its just that leaving/joining a gang would be impossible.

I see a flaw there tho, a gang could be kept in a gang war meaning their members can never leave and they never get new..

107$ [20] wrote:I see a flaw there tho, a gang could be kept in a gang war meaning their members can never leave and they never get new..

\

Thus if you put a penalty for leaving in place, people can leave but at a price, it means less gang hopping and nonsense

It would sort your entire thing out (personal opinion)

I dont think a penalty by leaving when in a gang war is right.. The gang could then again boot members to win the war, pay little get stats in return...



Rusty reminds you that bumping has been disabled

Rusty need to get the phuck out of my post if i'm not doing anything illegal... ,.|..